ISSN: 2782-893X
eISSN: 2799-0664
This study determined the level of managerial competence of secondary school
administrators (SSA) in four areas, namely: 1) Strategic Thinking and Innovation, 2) Instructional
Leadership, 3) Personal Excellence, and 4) Managerial Leadership. Ninety (90) SSA were selected
randomly across the strata using school category which are Mega-, Large-, Medium-, and Smallcategory schools in Pangasinan Division II, DepEd, Region I. To triangulate or crosscheck the
responses of the respondent-SSA, one stakeholder for every SSA was randomly selected to provide
qualitative information on the management of the SSA concerned.
It investigated the respondent-SSA profile variables, determined the mean differences of the levels
of managerial competence, and determined whether or not there are significant relationships
between the levels of managerial competence of the SSA and the profile variables. The salient
findings indicate that the SSA are female dominated, experienced, well-qualified, and relatively
young in service as secondary school administrators. The variables, civil status, number of relevant
in-service trainings attended, and school category differentiated the levels of managerial
competence among the SSA. The variable, school category was found to be significantly related
to the levels of managerial competence of the respondent-SSA. Qualitative data were gathered
from the respondent-stakeholders regarding their observation on the management of their
respective SSA and were analyzed topically.
The grand overall level of managerial competence of the respondent-SSA is equivalent to
“Competence,” in transmuted rating. Although, it was only in the area of Strategic Thinking and
Innovation where the respondent-SSA obtained an overall weighted mean (OWM) equivalent to
“Competent,” and that all the other OWM in the other three areas are equivalent to “Very
Competent,” the grand overall weighted mean (GOWM) which was used to measure the overall
managerial competence of the respondent-SSA was equivalent to “Competent.” This finding
corresponded with the qualitative observation and comments of the respondent-stakeholders.
It is strongly recommended that an Incentive Program in the form of a scholarship grant be
formulated, developed and implemented to help the deserving SSA to finish their Master’s degree
of Doctor’s degree, whichever applies. Further, it is highly recommended that in-service trainings
for these SSA should be focused on Strategic Thinking and Innovation to upgrade the managerial
competence of the SSA along this area. Furthermore, other studies be conducted using more
independent variables and on a wider scope under the auspices of accredited graduate institutions
in the area.