ISSN: 2782-893X
eISSN: 2799-0664
ISSN: 2782- 893X
— The issue of students at risk of dropping out, known as Student-at-risk of Dropping Out (SARDO) by the Philippines’ Department of Education, poses a significant challenge to educational systems worldwide. This study explores the impact of close monitoring on SARDOs in several elementary schools in the district of Baleno, Masbate province. Close monitoring involves personalized support and continuous engagement to identify and address the needs of atrisk students. Utilizing quantitative data, the research examines the effectiveness of various monitoring strategies and their outcomes on student retention and success. The study employs a survey questionnaire to gather data from at-risk students and teachers involved in the monitoring program. The results reveal that close monitoring is perceived as highly beneficial by students, with an average weighted mean of 4.60 indicating a “strongly agree” rating. Students believe that close monitoring helps identify areas where they need assistance, ensures timely completion of assignments, and fosters a sense of connection with teachers and the school community. Furthermore, the study highlights that students perceive the support and interventions received through close monitoring very positively, with an average weighted mean of 4.52. Teachers, however, face challenges such as resistance from students, coordination with parents, maintaining motivation, limited resources, and balancing monitoring responsibilities with regular teaching duties. Despite these challenges, teachers prioritize strategies like involving parents, providing feedback and positive reinforcement, regular one-on-one meetings, additional tutoring, and offering mental health resources. Overall, the findings suggest that implementing or maintaining close monitoring practices can significantly enhance students’ academic performance and engagement, thus reducing dropout rates among at-risk learners. Addressing the challenges faced by teachers can further improve the effectiveness of these interventions. Keywords — At-Risk Students, Close Monitoring, Dropout, Student Engagement